Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Flowchart of patient selection and data processing.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

The aorta was visualized in M-mode.

AoD: Diastolic diameter of the ascending aorta; AoS: Systolic diameter of the ascending aorta.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Anthropometric and echocardiographic characteristics of participants by group.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 3.

Comparison of aortic elasticity indices.

(A) Comparison of aortic distensibility between the diabetes group and control group. (B) Comparison of aortic compliance between the diabetes group and the control group. (C) Comparison of strains between the diabetes group and control group. (D) Comparison of the aortic stiffness indices between the diabetes group and the control group. (E) Comparison of Peterson’s elastic modulus between the diabetes group and control group. T2DM: diabetes mellitus.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Computed aortic elasticity parameters of participants by group.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 4.

Correlations between anthropometric and echocardiographic features and computed aortic indices.

BSA: body surface area; BMI: body mass index; HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin; LAd: left atrial diameter; RWT: relative wall thickness; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; LVMI: left ventricular mass index; AC: aortic compliance; AD: aortic distensibility; AS: aortic strain; ASI: aortic stiffness index; AEM: Aortic Peterson’s elastic modulus.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 3.

Generalized linear model results of aortic elasticity indices adjusted by systolic and diastolic blood pressure.

More »

Table 3 Expand