Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Angle-to-angle and corneal diameter measurement techniques.

(A) Angle-to-angle (AA) distance measured in a vertical axial UBM image; (B) Horizontal and vertical corneal diameter (CD) measured in a cornea photograph of a six-year-old child without ocular disease.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Participant demographics.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Descriptive summary.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Inter-observer agreement.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

Agreement between angle-to-angle and corneal diameter measurements.

Bland-Altman plots depicting the agreement between (A) horizontal corneal diameter (CD) and horizontal angle-to-angle (AA) measurements; (B) vertical CD and vertical AA measurements. The solid line represents the mean difference (bias), and the dotted lines represent 95% LoA.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Linear relationship between angle-to-angle and corneal diameter.

Regression plots depicting the relationship between corneal diameter (CD) and angle-to-angle (AA) measurements for: (A) horizontal and (B) vertical measurements for all eyes, where subject age is represented by shade, with darker shades corresponding with older children; (C) horizontal and (D) vertical measurements for healthy control subjects; (E) horizontal and (F) vertical measurements for subjects with glaucoma.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 4.

Pearson correlation and linear regression.

More »

Table 4 Expand