Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Diagram of B. impatiens microcolony setup.

Consists of (1) Entrance/exit tube with ramp, with yellow tape placed around entry and on ramp to guide bees in; (2) Main chamber, plastic with lid on top and perforations for airflow (not pictured), with 8 individual bees; (3) Pollen balls (made in-lab with Arizona sourced pollen granules (CC Pollen High Desert brand) and 30% sucrose solution); (4) Tube with 30% sucrose solution, with small hole at base.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Flowchart of bumble bee pollination and tarnished plant bug damage trials.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Tarnished plant bug pronotal width at widest point across a landscape gradient.

Red points/line are female bugs, blue are males. (A) Urban land cover, trendlines = linear regressions, shaded area = 95% confidence area. (B) Forested land cover, trendlines = linear regressions, shaded area = 95% confidence area.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

(A) Fruit weight in grams for flowers that were visited or not visited by a bumble bee (*** = p<0.001) (B) For all plants both pollinated and unpollinated, fruit weight in grams by presence or absence of tarnished plant bugs. Each plant was exposed to one individual for 24 hours. (p = 0.817).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

(A) Fruit weight by size of bumble bee visitor (p = 0.6252); (B) Fruit weight by size of tarnished plant bug the plant was exposed to for 24 hours (p = 0.0661). Both A and B only include data from fruits that were pollinated.

More »

Fig 5 Expand