Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Overall data flow, EGASP Thailand, 2015–2021.

Diagram showing the pathway for clinical and laboratory data in this surveillance pilot program, including the data audit approach for Bangrak Hospital (BH) and Silom Community Clinic (SCC).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Accuracy of laboratory and clinical data by data audit cycle, EGASP Thailand, 2015–2021.

Comparison of source document and database accuracy over the course of the pilot surveillance project from 2015–2020 (Cycle 1: 11/2015–6/2016, Cycle 2: 7/2016–11/2017, Cycle 3: 12/2017–10/2018, Cycle 4: 11/2018–10/2019, and Cycle 5: 11/2019–12/2020). Accuracy was calculated as the proportion of data elements from both source documents and surveillance database that were identical (n) compared to all elements reviewed during the audit (N), for data from the clinical encounter (clinical data), laboratory workup (laboratory data), and clinical/laboratory combined (overall). The trend in accuracy of clinical (dashed line) and laboratory (solid line) data are shown over the surveillance period (cycles 1–5) with 95% confidence intervals (vertical bars).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Completeness of laboratory and clinical data by data audit cycle, EGASP Thailand, 2015–2021.

Comparison of source document and database completeness over the course of the pilot surveillance project from 2015–2020 (Cycle 1: 11/2015–6/2016, Cycle 2: 7/2016–11/2017, Cycle 3: 12/2017–10/2018, Cycle 4: 11/2018–10/2019, and Cycle 5: 11/2019–12/2020). Completeness was calculated as the proportion of data elements from source documents and surveillance database that were complete (no missing data in either source documents or database, n) compared to all elements reviewed during the audit (N), for data from the clinical encounter (clinical data), laboratory workup (laboratory data), and clinical/laboratory combined (overall). The trend in completeness of clinical (dashed line) and laboratory (solid line) data are shown over the surveillance period (cycles 1–5) with 95% confidence intervals (vertical bars).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Concordance of laboratory data elements between source documents and EGASP database for five audit cycles, EGASP Thailand, 2015–2021.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Concordance of clinical data elements between source documents and EGASP database for five audit cycles, EGASP Thailand, 2015–2021.

More »

Table 2 Expand