Fig 1.
Illustration of the concept of the present study.
Left: Alpha wave oscillation in a cortical area forms a balance between excitation and inhibition via neural circuits with subcortical structures such as the thalamus and other cortices and networks at rest. P: cortical pyramidal cells. Top right: The waxing and waning of alpha oscillations occurs in a balance in relation to the excitation and inhibition balance of the cortical region and is transmitted as neural information. In dementia, this balance is abnormal and functional impairment occurs. Arrows indicate positive (Ap) and negative (An) accelerations, second-order derivatives in time, of the alpha envelope. Bottom right: Mathematical implication. Neural oscillator models, such as neural mass models, contain non-linear equations of oscillation. The second-order derivatives in the equations can be inhibitory or excitatory forces, the balance of which is an important element of neural function. The small black and gray balance diagram in the figure shows a balanced and imbalanced condition, respectively. We calculated the ratio of positive and negative acceleration values, Ap-An ratio, during an analysis period in the present study. We assumed that the ratio was an indicator of the balance between excitation and inhibition in the cortical region. Note: The equations are simple oscillator model equations for illustrative purposes, not equations describing the envelope of the alpha oscillation.
Fig 2.
Representation of the electroencephalography (EEG) signal analysis method.
The figures were created using 5-second EEG signals obtained at the F4 electrode in sub-037 (221–226 sec). A: EEG signals filtered by alpha band frequency (8–12 c/s). B: EEG signals rectified (thin line) and peak envelope (solid line). C: First derivative of the envelope. D: Second-order derivative of the envelope. E: An Ap-An ratio was an absolute value of the ratio of mean positive derivatives to mean negative derivatives for 60 seconds.
Fig 3.
Relationship between envelope amplitude and first and second-order derivatives at electrodes F4 and O2 at each sampling point in 60 seconds.
One participant was presented in each group. Each vertical axis represents the envelope amplitude and the horizontal axis represents the first (Velocity) and the second-order (Acceleration) derivatives in time of the envelope (see Fig 2D) at each sampling point. While the first derivative values were symmetrically distributed with positive and negative values for each envelope amplitude, the second-order derivative values showed an asymmetrical distribution depending on the value of the envelope amplitude. In other words, the positive second-order derivative values were larger for smaller envelope amplitudes, while the negative second-order derivative values had a similar distribution for all amplitudes. The Ap-An ratios of the NC participant were lower than those of the AD and FTD participants, regardless of the envelope amplitude. NC: normal control; AD: participants with Alzheimer’s disease; FTD: participants with frontotemporal dementia.
Table 1.
Amplitude of the envelope and peak frequency in the alpha frequency band at each electrode.
Table 2.
The Ap and An values of the alpha envelope and the Ap-An ratio at each electrode.
Fig 4.
The mean envelope amplitude and mean Ap-An ratio at each electrode in the groups.
The graphs are arranged from left to right, starting with the electrode with the highest value in the NC group. The Ap-An ratio was correlated with the envelope amplitude as shown in Table 3, but the order of the Ap-An ratio did not necessarily coincide with the order of the envelope amplitude. Black columns/circles (NC): normal control; white columns/circles (AD): participants with Alzheimer’s disease; and light gray columns/circles (FTD): participants with frontotemporal dementia. A vertical bar indicates a standard deviation for each envelope amplitude. The Ap-An ratio was strongly negatively correlated with envelope amplitude across 19 electrodes in the NC (r = -0.921, *p < 0.000001) and FTD (-0.771, *0.00011) groups, but not in the AD group (r = -0.306).
Fig 5.
Correlation between alpha envelope amplitude and Ap-An ratio at electrode (10 electrodes were shown).
NC (black circles): normal control; AD (white circles): participants with Alzheimer’s disease; FTD (gray circles): participants with frontotemporal dementia. Correlation curves were shown for each electrode. Significant correlation coefficient: *p < 0.05, corrected by FDR.
Table 3.
Correlation between alpha envelope amplitude and the Ap-An ratio at each electrode.
Fig 6.
Correlation between envelope amplitude (Amplitude) and the Ap-An ratio.
All values in each group were plotted as black dots, and correlation curves for 19 electrodes were shown. NC: normal control; AD: participants with Alzheimer’s disease; FTD: participants with frontotemporal dementia.