Table 1.
Variables extracted from papers.
Fig 1.
PRISMA flow diagram describing selection of studies.
Table 2.
Summary statistics of study characteristics and results of included papers.
Fig 2.
Modified forest plot of all papers that reported a CV for CRP, split by health status.
Fig 3.
Modified forest plot of all papers that reported a CV for hsCRP, split by health status.
Fig 4.
Forest plot of all papers that reported an ICC for CRP, split by health status, with meta-analysis.
Note that the lower confidence interval for Kelly was manually truncated at 0, since the meta-analysis gave a negative value which is meaningless for an ICC.
Fig 5.
Forest plot of all papers that reported an ICC for hsCRP, split by health status, with meta-analysis.
Table 3.
Highest risk of bias with questions B4 and B5 excluded (1 is best possible score, 4 is worst possible score).