Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

More »

Expand

Table 1.

Example sentences for each condition.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Mean (SD) word frequency of each category.

Word frequency is calculated as the number of occurrences out of 3-million-word entries.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Learners background information.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 1.

Trial demonstration of the SPRT.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Trial demonstration of the untimed GJT.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Native Koreans’ RT for the past-tense verbs (Verb) and for the present verbs (Case).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

All learners’ GJT results by group (dot indicates the group-level mean).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 4.

Group-level GJT accuracy means and SDs.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Low proficiency learners’ accuracy (%).

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

High proficiency learners’ accuracy (%).

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Learners’ accuracy (%) for the ADJ structure, dots indicate group-level means.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Learners’ accuracy (%) for the Verb structure, dots indicate group-level means.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Learners’ accuracy (%) for the Case structure, dots indicate group-level means.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

All groups’ RT, colored for grammaticality.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Native speakers’ RT, colored for grammaticality.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Low proficiency group’s RT, colored for grammaticality.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

High proficiency group’s RT, colored for grammaticality.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Trial demonstration of the EEG grammaticality judgement task.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

Channel location map.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

Neighbour plot for the cluster-based permutation analysis (Cz highlighted).

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Table 5.

Example sentences for each condition.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Group-level means and SDs for timed GJT accuracy.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 17.

Native Korean speakers’ timed GJT accuracy (%) in the three conditions.

More »

Fig 17 Expand

Fig 18.

Learners’ timed GJT accuracy (%) in the three conditions.

More »

Fig 18 Expand

Fig 19.

Native Koreans’ grand averaged waveforms on Fz, Cz and Pz regions.

(a) the ADJ condition. (b) the Verb condition. (c) the Case condition. Blue: Grammatical; Red: Violation. Bars indicate time windows with a significant effect of grammaticality, with marked early negativity (yellow box) and P600 (green box) components.

More »

Fig 19 Expand

Fig 20.

Learners’ grand averaged waveforms for Word_3 of the ADJ condition.

More »

Fig 20 Expand

Fig 21.

Learners’ grand averaged waveforms for Word_4 of the ADJ condition.

More »

Fig 21 Expand

Table 7.

Example adjective-noun phrases in Cantonese.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig 22.

Learners’ grand averaged waveforms for the Verb condition.

More »

Fig 22 Expand

Fig 23.

Learners’ grand averaged waveforms for the Case condition.

More »

Fig 23 Expand