Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Schematic representation of the Markov model.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Model input parameters.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Model input parameters for the scenario analysis.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Deterministic result of the base-case analysis.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Deterministic result of the scenario analysis based on an effect duration of 11-year.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 2.

Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for base-case based on HERA trial [5] and all scenarios[3].

Abbreviations: GDP: Gross domestic product; QALYs: Quality-adjusted life years.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 5.

Deterministic results for the scenario analysis based on a joint analysis from NSABP B-31 and NCCTG N9831 [3].

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 3.

Tornado diagram of one-way sensitivity analysis for the base case.

Abbreviations: DFS: Disease-free survival; HR: Hazard ratio; ICER: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; LRR: Locoregional recurrence; OS: Overall survival.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Cost-effectiveness plane from the probabilistic sensitivity analysis based on 1,000 simulations.

Abbreviations: GDP: Gross domestic product; QALYs: Quality-adjusted life years.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve for the base-case analysis.

Abbreviations: GDP: Gross domestic product.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve for the scenario analysis based on a joint analysis from NSABP B-31 and NCCTG N9831[3].

Abbreviations: GDP: Gross domestic product; QALYs: Quality-adjusted life years.

More »

Fig 6 Expand