Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Classification of pelvic ring fractures according to AO/OTA classification system.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

The number of X-ray data and normal data collected by pelvic fracture type.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

(a) a collection pelvic X-ray image, (b) a pelvic region ROI image.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

(a) in case the pelvic area is not clearly visible due to severe blur and (b) in case the pelvic area is not clearly visible due to organs and gases.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 3.

Datasets used for training and testing of machine learning models.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 3.

Image and histogram changes before and after application of the histogram equalization algorithm.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Radiomics feature extraction is performed for the pelvic ring region.

18 first-order features, 75 second-order features. Second-order features included 24 GLCM, 16 GLRLM, 16 GLSZM, 5 NGTDM, and 14 GLDM.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

After radiomics feature extraction, the feature selection method is used to select meaningful features for training the machine learning model.

Learning proceeds based on selected features. Comparison of specialist’s reading findings and machine learning model prediction results.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

AUC for each combination of LR, SVM, RF, XGB, MLP, KNN, and LGBM machine learning models and RFE, SFS, LASSO, and Ridge feature selection methods through heatmap.

The higher the heatmap value, the closer it is to black, and the higher the performance for the classification of instability of pelvic fracture. LR, logistic regression; SVM, support vector machine; RF, random forest; XGB, extreme gradient boosting; MLP, multi-layer perceptron; KNN, k-nearest neighbor; LGBM, light gradient boosting machine; RFE, recursive feature elimination; SFS, sequential feature selection.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

ROC analysis results of machine learning models LR, SVM, RF, XGB, MLP, KNN, and LGBM for classification of normal and pelvic fracture types when using feature selection method RFE.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

A graph of the average feature importance of feature selection method RFE and each machine learning model combination.

The higher the heatmap value, the closer it is to black, and the higher the impact on the instability classification of pelvic fracture.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Feature importance graph for feature selection method RFE and each machine learning model: LR, SVM, RF, MLP, XGB, KNN, and LGBM.

The higher the heatmap value, the closer it is to black, and the higher the impact on the instability classification of pelvic fracture.

More »

Fig 9 Expand