Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

The modified conceptual framework for the primary health care quality for chronic diseases in rural China.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Definitions and data sources for quality domains and subdomains.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Characteristics of the study sample.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Average quality domain and sub-domain score of PHC for hypertension, diabetes, and comorbidity.

For quality score, 0 represents the lowest quality, and 1 represents the highest quality. Clinical care score was displayed by sub-domains due to disparate data sources including chart abstraction, patient survey, provider survey and national registry data. Comorbidity refers to a dual diagnosis of hypertension and diabetes.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

The distribution of average PHC quality score by socioeconomic characteristics (95% CI).

The distribution of quality scores for assessment, diagnoses, and treatment in marriage, education, income group, and medical insurance were based on matched data between chart abstraction and patient survey; Quality scores for medical knowledge are at the provider level rather than the patient level. NA, is not applicable, meaning no observations in that category. UEBMI, Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance. URBMI, Urban Resident Basic Medical Insurance. NCMS, New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme. URRBMI, Urban and Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance. Comorbidity refers to a dual diagnosis of hypertension and diabetes.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

The associations between provider’s characteristics and provider competencea.

More »

Table 3 Expand