Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Legend for the original 19-class LM map (a), and the new enhanced 103-class LM map (b). Numbers in (b) are class codes.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Explanation of how to read the Landscape Mosaic pixel triplet values, denoting their relative contribution to blue, green, and red (here agriculture, natural, and developed) at a given location and for the local moving window area in use.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

LM around Atlanta for the year 2021 using a moving window size of 13 pixels.

Showing the 103-class LM map and applying different color tables to highlight dominant background land cover (a), degree of diversity (b), or anthropic intensity (c).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

LM 103-class mapping to the degree of anthropic intensity (a); associated 103-class pixel color scheme (b); and respective anthropic intensity value (c).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Anthropic intensity for Atlanta 2001 and 2021 (a); histogram of change pixels and anthropic intensity change color range legend (b); locations and degree of anthropic intensity change (c). Results based on 13-pixel window size (~15 ha).

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Temporal change (2001–2021) of LM around Atlanta using a moving window size of 13 pixels.

LM heatmap for 2001 (a), LM heatmap for 2021 (b), and the delta heatmap showing change in LM-class percentages between the two LM heatmaps with the maximum increase and decrease highlighted in black circles (c).

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

LM for the year 2021 around Atlanta: comparison of LM-classes across five analysis scales of moving window size (a); summary proportions per scale and difference in LM-Background and refined Mixed (b); delta heatmap between smallest and largest scale with the maximum increase and decrease highlighted in black circles (c).

More »

Fig 7 Expand