Fig 1.
Flow chat of sample selection from the NHANES.
Fig 2.
Regions of android fat, and gynoid fat assessed by DXA [49].
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of 4751 participants according to menopausal status.
Table 2.
The associations of fat mass distribution with protein, carbohydrate and fat intakes.
Table 3.
Analysis of fat mass distribution with protein, carbohydrate, and fat intake across different menopausal statuses.
Fig 3.
The associations between fat mass distribution and protein intake.
(a)-(f) Associations of TPF, APF, GPF, A/G, SAT, VAT with protein intake stratified menopausal status. Age, race, energy intake, parity, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, smoking status, heavy alcohol and vigorous work activity were adjusted.
Fig 4.
The associations between fat mass distribution and fat intake.
(a)-(f) Associations of TPF, APF, GPF, A/G, SAT, VAT with fat intake stratified menopausal status. Age, race, energy intake, parity, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, smoking status, heavy alcohol and vigorous work activity were adjusted.
Fig 5.
The associations between fat mass distribution and carbohydrate intake.
(a)-(f) Associations of TPF, APF, GPF, A/G, SAT, VAT with carbohydrate intake stratified menopausal status. Age, race, energy intake, parity, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, smoking status, heavy alcohol and vigorous work activity were adjusted.