Table 1.
The urban resilience evaluation indicator system.
Table 2.
Comparison of some main evaluation methods for MADM.
Fig 1.
The research framework.
Table 3.
The classification of development level.
Table 4.
Weights of subsystem indicators.
Table 5.
P,L,E subsystem’s development level.
Table 6.
Urban resilience development level.
Fig 2.
The results of factor obstacle diagnosis.
Fig 3.
The factor contribution degree.
Table 7.
The relative ranking of urban resilience level from 2011 to 2021.
Fig 4.
The relative ranking of urban resilience level.
Fig 5.
The development level of PLE, PL, PE, LE system.
Table 8.
The weak subsystems of 18 cities.