Fig 1.
The stimulus used to generate Mira.
The spectrum of the test signal, Normalized frequency, is the digital frequency of the spectrum. The horizontal dashed line represents the spatial sensitivity threshold [26].
Fig 2.
Structural diagram of the display system installation for research [26].
Fig 3.
Photocell with a linear light-signal characteristic connected to an oscilloscope.
Fig 4.
Dependence of luminance in the immediate vicinity of the monitor on the pixel brightness value.
Fig 5.
The results for the temporal components of responses of the participants in Experiment 1 compared to the linear model and pyramid of visibility, dashed lines are the linear model while solid lines are from data points, where red data from Experiment 1 and blue from Watson’s work.
Fig 6.
Contrast sensitivity as a function of spatial frequency at several temporal frequencies from Experiment 2 compared to the pyramid of visibility [8], FovVideoVDP [4], stelaCSF [22].
Fig 7.
Contrast sensitivity as a function of temporal frequency at several spatial frequencies in Experiment 2 compared the pyramid of visibility [8], FovVideoVDP [4], stelaCSF [22].
Fig 8.
The average of measured values for all evaluations log(s) of Experiment 2 (120 pixel brightness level).
Fig 9.
Visualization of contrast sensitivity models (from left to right): Pyramid of visibility [8], FovVideoVDP [4], stelaCSF [22], Visibility model.
Fig 10.
Block diagram PSNR inclusion of stelaCSF model [22], where * is the convolution.
Table 1.
Comparison of the video quality metrics.
Pearson correlation coefficient (PLCC).
Fig 11.
The model of visibility is built from the values of Experiment 2 with a pixel brightness stimulus level of red-40, yellow-80, green-120, blue-160, purple- 200 where s = 0.1.