Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

(A) The 8 polar angles tested, starting with 0° in the right visual field and preceding counterclockwise in 45° increments. The horizontal and vertical meridians are represented by pink and purple dashed lines, respectively. (B) Examples of female (left) and male (right) faces. (C) Experimental paradigm. A Gaussian fixation point first appeared, then a face was presented for 500 ms at one of the eight possible locations, selected randomly (shown here at 180°). Each face was followed by a mask which remained on screen until a keyboard response was made. Faces varied in size from trial to trial according to an adaptive QUEST+ procedure.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Psychometric functions for a single participant, showing the proportion of correct gender judgements for different sized upright faces at each of the 8 visual field locations (labelled at the top of each graph, where 0 = rightwards, 90 = upwards, etc.).

Performance improves monotonically as a function of face size. Dashed grey lines plot thresholds for gender acuity (the size at which 75% accuracy was reached).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Mean gender acuity thresholds (in degrees of visual angle) measured in Experiment 1, plotted in two ways. Firstly, as a bar graph (A) with each angular location indicated via colour (see legend). Individual data points represent thresholds for each participant. Secondly, as a polar angle plot (B), where 0° is at the right and angles proceed counterclockwise in 45° jumps. Upright faces are shown in purple and inverted in pink. Shaded regions denote ± 1 SEM.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

In Experiment 1 (left panels), faces were presented 10° from fixation according to the centre of the face. In Experiment 2 (right panels), the centre of the eyes was always 10° from fixation regardless of face size, angular location or inversion.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Mean gender acuity thresholds from Experiment 2, first shown as a bar graph (A) with each location indicated via colour (see legend). Individual data points represent thresholds for each participant. Mean thresholds are also visualised in a polar angle plot (B), with 0° at the right and angles increasing counterclockwise by 45° each time. Upright faces are shown in purple and inverted in pink. Shaded regions represent ± 1 SEM. (C) Bar charts comparing the horizontal-vertical difference and upper-lower difference in Experiments 1 and 2. Data are plotted for upright faces only. Horizontal refers to thresholds averaged across 0° and 180° locations, with vertical the average of 90° and 270°. Upper represents 90° and lower 270°. Individual data points represent thresholds for each participant. Significant differences (p < .05) are marked with an asterisk.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Mean gender acuity thresholds for the upper (90°; lighter blue) versus lower (270°; darker blue) visual field, for both upright and inverted faces.

The asterisk represents a significant difference (p < .05). Individual data points represent thresholds for each participant, with lines connecting their performance between upper and lower locations.

More »

Fig 6 Expand