Fig 1.
Example images of (A) Agapostemon virescens, (B) Halictus ligatus, (C) Lasioglossum oceanicum, (D) Bombus griseocollis, (E) Lasioglossum leucozonium, and (F) Agapostemon texanus. Images are not to relative scale and, except for cropping, are left unprocessed.
Table 1.
Species list and mean species-level classification model performance for pinned bee images.
Table 2.
Species list and mean species-level classification model performance for bee wing images.
Table 3.
Classification model performance scores for each of the three test set versions of the pinned and wing datasets.
Fig 2.
Pinned bee confusion matrix with results combined over the three test sets.
Values represent the number of images for predicted and true (actual) species. Colored boxes outline the predictions within genera.
Fig 3.
Bee wing confusion matrix with results combined over the three test sets.
Values represent the number of images for predicted and true (actual) species. Colored boxes outline the predictions within genera.
Fig 4.
Example SmoothGrad images of wings from three different Bombus sandersoni specimens.
Warmer colors indicate pixels that contributed more to the prediction. Red highlights around the second cubital cell suggest that this region is important for classifying these three images as B. sandersoni.