Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Flow chart of exclusions.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Characteristics of women for encounters overall and by year for the time series and attrition analyses.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Predicted vs. actual number of screening mammogram encounters by week and year.

Actual (gray dots and triangles) and predicted (brown line) number of mammograms per week by year model results. The orange area indicates 95% credible intervals and the blue is the prediction band for the situation where there was no pandemic in effect.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Predicted vs, actual number of mammogram encounters by week stratified by race/ethnicity.

Actual (gray dots and triangles) and predicted (brown line) number of mammograms per week by year model results. The orange area indicates 95% credible intervals and the blue is the prediction band for the situation where there was no pandemic in effect.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Predicted vs. actual number of mammogram encounters by week stratified by age group.

Actual (gray dots and triangles) and predicted (brown line) number of mammograms per week by year model results. The orange area indicates 95% credible intervals and the blue is the prediction band for the situation where there was no pandemic in effect.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 2.

Screening encounter model estimates of the pandemic period and missed or delayed visits overall and by race and age group.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Race/ethnicity and age group associated attrition in mammogram screening among those with screening mammogram encounters in 2019 during the COVID-19 pandemic and among those with screening mammogram encounters in 2018 before the pandemica.

More »

Table 3 Expand