Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Flowable composites used in this study.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

The standards used in the study.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Primer sequences for genes used in this experiment.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 1.

Characterization of DPSCs.

A- DPSCs with fibroblast-like morphology. B- Flowcytomettry analysis of surface antigens CD105, CD90, CD73, CD45, CD34, and HLA.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

In vitro differentiation assays.

A: Photomicrographs of ARS staining of DPSCs showing red calcium phosphate deposit staining confirm osteogenic differentiation. B: Photomicrographs of Oil Red O staining showing brownish-red oil droplets confirm adipogenic differentiation. C: Photomicrographs of Alcian Blue staining showing blue staining of sulfated proteoglycans confirm chondrogenic differentiation.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Cell viability assay.

Mean, standard deviation, and comparative statistics of cell viability percentage of DPSCs after exposure to flowable composite discs extracts at Day 1, 3, and 7. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 indicate significance.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Mean monomer release (ug/ml) of TEGDMA, BISGMA, and UDMA from nano-hybrid flowable composites at days 1, 3, and 7.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 4.

HPLC analysis.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Cell migration assay.

Photomicrographs showing wound closure at the initiation of wound (day 0) and after 1, 2, and 3 days.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Cell migration statistics

Bar chart showing mean, standard deviation, and comparative statistical results of wound closure percentage on days 1, 2, and 3 of different dilutions of eluates, (a) Undiluted, (b) Dilution 1:2, and (c) Dilution 1:4 *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 indicates significance.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Alizarin red staining.

Photomicrographs of ARS staining for the control group (A), Osteogenic group (B), AEF (C), and PNF (D) (x40 original magnification). (E) Bar chart of mean and standard deviation of the absorbance of ARS staining. **** p < 0.0001 indicates significance.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

ALP activity assay.

The graph represents the enzymatic activity of ALP measured as the rate of pNPP accumulation across different groups. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 indicates significance.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

RT-PCR.

Bar chart showing relative gene expression of OPG, RUNX2, and DSPP. Data are presented as mean and standard deviation. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 indicates significance.

More »

Fig 9 Expand