Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Patients’ sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics presented in n (%).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Prevalence of comorbid conditions in Charlson comorbidity index presented in n (%).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

MUST steps for malnutrition screening.

(A) BMI. (B) Weight loss percentage. (C) Acute disease effect. (D) Malnutrition risk.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 3.

Patient’s biochemical levels presented in n (%).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Cancer-related characteristics presented in n (%).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Chemotherapy side effect frequency, severity, and daily activity effect presented in n (%) and mean (SD).

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Cancer-induced taste alteration scale score presented in n (%) and mean (SD).

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Coping and self-management strategies to deal with taste alterations presented in n (%).

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig 2.

Prevalence of taste alteration according to CiTAS subscale.

(A) Basic taste reduction subscale. (B) Taste disorder (discomfort) subscale. (C) Phantogeusia and parageusia subscale. (D) General taste alterations subscale.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 8.

Changes in CiTAS according to nutritional status factors measured by malnutrition universal screening tool MUST.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Effect of sociodemographic factors and lifestyle on changes in CiTAS.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Table 10.

Effect of cancer-related data on taste alterations.

More »

Table 10 Expand

Table 11.

Changes in Ci-TAS according to chemotherapeutic side effects.

More »

Table 11 Expand

Table 12.

Effect of comorbidities on taste alterations.

More »

Table 12 Expand