Fig 1.
Study procedure.
Table 1.
Item estimates, standard error, critical ratio and p-value.
Fig 2.
A: Initial model of the Collaborative Practice Assessment Tool (8-factor 56-item model). B: Final model of the Australian Collaborative Practice Assessment Tool (7-factor 54-item model).
Table 2.
Internal consistency reliability.
Table 3.
Full model comparison.
Fig 3.
3A. Assumption model for the practitioner dataset. 3B. Assumption model for the student dataset.
Table 4.
Direct and indirect assumptions for the practitioner.
Table 5.
Direct and indirect assumptions for the student.