Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Physical structure of the proposed resonator with its approximated LC circuit, where the equivalents of la, lb, lc, ld, coupling and open-end capacitors are La, Lb, LC, Ld, C and CO respectively.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Simplifying the LC circuit (using Δ-Y transformation).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

The proposed BPFs with their frequency responses, where all dimensions are written in mm.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

The proposed triplexer composed of BPF1, BPF2 and BPF3 (unit: mm).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Current density distributions of the designed triplexer for simulating ports 2, 3 and 4 at 2.5 GHz, 4.4 GHz and 6 GHz, respectively.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Frequency responses as nine functions of the effective physical dimensions l1, l2, l3, l4, S1, S2, w1, w2, w3.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Common port return loss and isolations as six functions of the effective physical dimensions l1, l2, l3, l4, S1 and S2.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Simulated (solid lines) and measured (dashed lines) frequency responses of the proposed triplexer.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Narrowband and wideband group delays at all channels.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Fabricated triplexer.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Table 1.

Comparison between our triplexer and the previous works (*: Approximated values).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Group delay comparison (*: Approximated values).

More »

Table 2 Expand