Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Related studies on IDS using deep learning.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

A diagram showing the workflow of the proposed architecture with hyperparameters to classify intrusions.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

A diagram showing the workflow of the proposed novel hybrid- MCL-FWA-BILSTM based architecture to classify intrusions.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Description of the NSL-KDD dataset attack categories.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Attack types and their description in the UNSW-NB15 dataset.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 3.

The architecture of the BI-LSTM model.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Confusion matrix related to IDS for performance evaluation.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 4.

Confusion matrix of NSL-KDD on the proposed approach.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Performance metrics of NSL-KDD dataset using MCL-FWA-BILSTM model.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 5.

MCL-FWA-BILSTM model precision, DR, F-Score and FPR comparison on NSL-KDD dataset.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Binary classification accuracy and DR comparison on NSL-KDD.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 6.

Confusion matrix of UNSW-NB-15 dataset using MCL-FWA-BILSTM approach.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Performance Metrics of the UNSW-NB15 dataset on the proposed approach.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig 7.

MCL-FWA-BILSTM model precision, DR, F-Score and FPR comparison on UNSW-NB15.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Comparison of accuracy and DR on UNSW-NB15.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

MCL-FWA-BILSTM binary and multiclass accuracy comparison.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Comparison of accuracy of MCL-FWA-BILSTM model with existing models for binary classification on UNSW-NB15 and NSL-KDD.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

MCL-FWA-BILSTM accuracy comparison with existing approaches for multiclass classification.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Comparison of DR and FPR of UNSW-NB15.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

F-Score, DR and FPR comparison for multiclass classification on UNSW-NB15.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Minority attack class detection rate of UNSW-NB15 using MCL-FWA-BILSTM model.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

Comparison of DR and FPR of NSL- KDD dataset using MCL-FWA-BILSTM model.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

F-score, DR and FPR comparison for multiclass on NSL-KDD using MCL-FWA-BILSTM.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Fig 17.

Minority attack class detection rate of NSL-KDD dataset using MCL-FWA-BILSTM model.

More »

Fig 17 Expand

Fig 18.

Accuracy measures for MCL, FWA-BILSTM and proposed MCL-FWA-BILSTM.

More »

Fig 18 Expand

Table 8.

Accuracy comparison with existing approaches for Binary Classification with state of art on UNSW-NB15 and NSL-KDD.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Accuracy comparison with existing approaches for binary classification with state of art on UNSW-NB15 and NSL-KDD.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Table 10.

MCL-FWA-BILSTM accuracy comparison with existing approaches for multiclass classification with state of art on UNSW-NB15 and NSL-KDD.

More »

Table 10 Expand

Table 11.

MCL-FWA-BILSTM accuracy comparison with existing approaches for multiclass classification with state of art on UNSW-NB15 or NSL-KDD.

More »

Table 11 Expand

Table 12.

a. MCL-FWA-BILSTM comparison with the state of art on UNSW-NB15.

b. MCL-FWA-BILSTM model DR and FPR achievement.

More »

Table 12 Expand

Table 13.

MCL-FWA-BILSTM comparison with the state of art on NSl-KDD.

More »

Table 13 Expand

Table 14.

MCL-FWA-BILSTM and other existing approaches for multiclass classification in both datasets.

More »

Table 14 Expand