Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Response surface methodology overview.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Scatter plot of the yield stress and plastic viscosity response with the input variables.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Distribution histograms for inputs (in blue) and outputs (in green).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Statistical analysis of collected database.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Pearson correlation matrix.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

RSM build information.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

RSM factors for the studied parameters.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Fit summary of the plastic viscosity model.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Sequential model sum of squares [Type I] for the plastic viscosity.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

ANOVA for quadratic model for the plastic viscosity.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Fit statistics.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Coefficients in terms of actual factors.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Fig 4.

Color points by value of plastic viscosity for normal plot of residuals.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Lambda value of plastic viscosity for Box-Cox plot.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Color points by value of plastic viscosity for predicted vs actual values.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Color points by value of plastic viscosity for residuals vs predicted values.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Color points by value of plastic viscosity for residuals vs run.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Color points by value of plastic viscosity for residuals vs cement.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Color points by value of plastic viscosity for Cook’s distance.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Color points by value of plastic viscosity for leverage vs run.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Color points by value of plastic viscosity for DFFITS vs run.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Color points by value of plastic viscosity for intercept vs run.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Optimized plastic viscosity desirability behavior w.r.t. independent factors.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

Optimized plastic viscosity actual factor coding contour behavior.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

Optimized plastic viscosity 3D surface w.r.t. water and cement.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Fig 17.

Optimized plastic viscosity based on factor perturbation.

More »

Fig 17 Expand

Fig 18.

Optimized plastic viscosity w.r.t. water and cement interaction.

More »

Fig 18 Expand

Table 10.

Constraints of the RSM model for the plastic viscosity.

More »

Table 10 Expand

Table 11.

Fit Summary of the yield stress model.

More »

Table 11 Expand

Table 12.

Sequential model sum of squares [Type I] yield stress.

More »

Table 12 Expand

Table 13.

RSM model summary statistics.

More »

Table 13 Expand

Table 14.

ANOVA for quadratic model for the yield stress.

More »

Table 14 Expand

Table 15.

Fit statistics.

More »

Table 15 Expand

Table 16.

Coefficients in terms of actual factors.

More »

Table 16 Expand

Fig 19.

Color points by value of yield stress for normal plot of residuals.

More »

Fig 19 Expand

Fig 20.

Lambda points by value of yield stress for Box-Cox plot for power transforms.

More »

Fig 20 Expand

Fig 21.

Color points by value of yield stress for residuals vs predicted values.

More »

Fig 21 Expand

Fig 22.

Color points by value of yield stress for residuals vs run.

More »

Fig 22 Expand

Fig 23.

Color points by value of yield stress for residuals vs cement.

More »

Fig 23 Expand

Fig 24.

Color points by value of yield stress for Cook’s distance.

More »

Fig 24 Expand

Fig 25.

Color points by value of yield stress for leverage vs run.

More »

Fig 25 Expand

Fig 26.

Color points by value of yield stress for DFFITS vs run.

More »

Fig 26 Expand

Fig 27.

Color points by value of yield stress for intercept vs run.

More »

Fig 27 Expand

Fig 28.

The desirability optimization of the yield stress w.r.t. the independent factors.

More »

Fig 28 Expand

Fig 29.

Optimized yield stress perturbation.

More »

Fig 29 Expand

Fig 30.

Factor coding interaction for yield stress w.r.t. water and cement.

More »

Fig 30 Expand

Fig 31.

Optimized yield stress factor coding contour behavior.

More »

Fig 31 Expand

Fig 32.

Optimized yield stress 3D surface behavior.

More »

Fig 32 Expand

Table 17.

Yield stress model constraints.

More »

Table 17 Expand

Table 18.

Optimized solution from 100 solutions found.

More »

Table 18 Expand