Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Cultivar-specific parameters to be calibrated in CROPGRO-Soybean phenological model.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Detailed information on field experiments.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

The framework of model parameter estimation based on GLUE and different combinations of observed data in this work.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 3.

List of symbols used in this study.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Data sources for calibration and evaluation.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 2.

Comparisons of the measured and simulated phenological stages with calibration data from Exp. 1 and evaluation data from Exp. 2.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Comparisons of the measured and simulated phenological stages with calibration data from Exp. 3 and evaluation data from Exp. 4.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Changes of RMSEs (MAEs) with different combinations containing different number of observed phenological datasets for calibration.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Changes of R2 (NSEs) with different combinations containing different number of observed phenological datasets for calibration.

Where, R2 of Exp. 1 denotes the R2 is obtained based on the calibration data from Exp. 1. Other symbols follow this pattern.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 5.

Evaluation results of the calibration data from the different observed data combinations in Exp.1 and Exp. 3.

More »

Table 5 Expand