Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

SEM image of (a) Original dry sludge, (b) SBC, (c) MgSP-0.1 and (d) MgSBC-0.1, respectively.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

(a) N2 adsorption and desorption curve, (b) XRD patterns of SP, SBC and MgSBC-0.1 and (c) XPS spectra of SP, SBC, and MgSBC-0.1.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Elemental composition (Atomic%) and oxygen carbon atomic ratio of SP, SBC, P-MgSBC-0.1 and Des-MgSBC-0.1 estimated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 3.

(a-c) TEM images (500nm) of SP, SBC and MgSBC-0.1, (d-e) TEM images of MgSBC-0.1, (f-i) Elemental mapping of MgSBC-0.1.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

FTIR spectra of SP, SBC, and MgSBC-0.1.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

The effect of magnesium loading on the adsorption of P by Mg-loaded sludge-biochar.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

The phosphate adsorption isotherms and the kinetic curve (a and b) The fitting the phosphate adsorption isotherms of MgSBC-0.1 at different temperatures, (c) the kinetic curve of MgSBC-0.1, (d) particle diffusion model fitting of MgSBC-0.1.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 2.

Adsorption kinetics parameters of MgSBC-0.1.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Isothermal adsorption model parameters of MgSBC-0.1 at 298, 308, and 318 K, respectively.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 7.

The effect of initial pH on phosphate capture.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

(a) The effect of coexisting anions on phosphate capture and (b) the effect of coexisting cations and gumic acids on phosphate capture.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

(a) XRD spectrum of P-MgSBC-0.1 biochar, (b) XPS spectra of MgSBC-0.1, P-SBC, and P-MgSBC-0.1, (c) XPS spectra of Mg 1s before utilization and (d) after utilization phosphate adsorption of MgSBC-0.1, respectively.

More »

Fig 9 Expand