Table 1.
Proposed antenna dimensions in detail.
Fig 1.
Design configuration of the suggested single antenna (a) Front layout (b) Side layout.
Fig 2.
(a) Design stages of the recommended antenna (b) along with variation in |S11| vs Frequency plot.
Fig 3.
Parametric analysis of key parameters of the recommended antenna (a) Effect by variation in top-loaded stub W4 (b) Effect by variation in lower stub W2.
Fig 4.
Optimization algorithm flowchart.
Fig 5.
Recommended single-element antenna’s measurement setup.
Fig 6.
Predicated and measured |S11| parameter of the recommended antenna along with fabricated prototype.
Fig 7.
Predicated and measured radiation pattern characteristics of the recommended antenna at (a) 2.45 GHz (b) 5.4 GHz.
Fig 8.
Predicated and tested gain over frequency plot of recommended design.
Fig 9.
Predicted efficiency of the recommended antenna.
Table 2.
Comparison with literature work targeting similar bands.
Fig 10.
Proposed MIMO configuration (a) step-1 (b) step-2 (c) final design.
Fig 11.
|S12/21| of proposed MIMO antenna against with and without decoupling structure.
Fig 12.
Far-field measurement of proposed dual band two port MIMO antenna.
Fig 13.
Predicated and hardware-tested reflection coefficient of recommended 2-port MIMO configuration with the proposed coupling reduction techniques.
Fig 14.
Predicated and hardware tested transmission coefficient of recommended two port MIMO antenna with decoupling structure.
Fig 15.
Predicated and measured gain of proposed work.
Fig 16.
Simulated co- and cross polarization of the proposed two port MIMO antenna with decoupling structure at (a) 2.45 GHz (b) 5.4 GHz.
Fig 17.
ECC of suggested work.
Fig 18.
CCL performance of suggested work.
Fig 19.
DG of suggested work.
Fig 20.
MEG of suggested work.
Fig 21.
SAR analysis (a) simulation setup; simulated results at (b) 2.45 GHz (c) 5.8 GHz.
Table 3.
Performance results of suggested work along with literary works.