Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Comparison between the boundary beam and conventional transfer girder systems.

(a) Conventional transfer girder system. (b) Newly proposed boundary beam-wall system.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Typical shape and reinforcement details of the boundary beam-wall system.

(a) Front view. (b) Back view.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Specimen identification.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Details of the reference specimen (B50-T125-S125).

(Unit: mm).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Boundary beam section details of the test specimens.

(Unit: mm). (a) B50-T100-S125. (b) The other three specimens.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Wall section details of the test specimens.

(Unit: mm). (a) Upper wall. (b) Lower wall of specimen B50-T125-S125. (c) Lower wall of specimen B40-T125-S125. (d) Lower wall of specimen B50-T100-S125. (e) Lower wall of specimen B50-T125-S75.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 1.

Summary of test specimens.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Concrete material properties.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Rebar material properties.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 7.

Test setup.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Strain gauge setup.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Typical failure shape (Reference specimen B50-T125-S125).

(a) Front view. (b) Side view.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Lower wall failure shape of specimen B50-T125-S125.

(a) Overall view. (b) Left lower wall. (c) Right lower wall.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Lower wall failure shape of specimen B40-T125-S125.

(a) Overall view. (b) Left lower wall. (c) Right lower wall.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Lower wall failure shape of specimen B50-T100-S125.

(a) Overall view. (b) Left lower wall. (c) Right lower wall.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Lower failure shape of specimen B50-T125-S75.

(a) Overall view. (b) Left lower wall. (c) Right lower wall.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Load-displacement curves of the test specimens (LVDT-1).

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Table 4.

Test results.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 15.

Load-displacement curves of the test specimens (LVDT-2, LVDT-3).

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

Concrete strain distribution at the upper wall (C1~C3).

(a) Specimen B50-T125-S125. (b) Specimen B40-T125-S125. (c) Specimen B50-T100-S125. (d) Specimen B50-T125-S75.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Fig 17.

Concrete strain distribution near the end of the boundary beam (C4~C6).

(a) Specimen B50-T125-S125. (b) Specimen B40-T125-S125. (c) Specimen B50-T100-S125. (d) Specimen B50-T125-S75.

More »

Fig 17 Expand

Fig 18.

Concrete strain distribution at the lower wall (C10~C14).

(a) Specimen B50-T125-S125. (b) Specimen B40-T125-S125. (c) Specimen B50-T100-S125. (d) Specimen B50-T125-S75.

More »

Fig 18 Expand

Fig 19.

Main bar strain distribution at the top of the lower wall (S7~S10).

(a) Specimen B50-T125-S125. (b) Specimen B40-T125-S125. (c) Specimen B50-T100-S125. (d) Specimen B50-T125-S75.

More »

Fig 19 Expand

Fig 20.

Stirrup strain distribution at the top of the lower wall (S11~S13).

(a) Specimen B50-T125-S125. (b) Specimen B50-T125-S75.

More »

Fig 20 Expand

Fig 21.

Load transfer path of each specimen.

More »

Fig 21 Expand

Fig 22.

Stress-strain curves of concrete.

(a) Compressive behavior. (b) Tensile behavior.

More »

Fig 22 Expand

Fig 23.

Finite element mesh adopted in this study.

(a) Concrete. (b) Rebars.

More »

Fig 23 Expand

Fig 24.

Boundary conditions of the finite element model.

More »

Fig 24 Expand

Fig 25.

Finite element meshes used for sensitivity analysis.

(a) Three different meshes used for sensitivity analysis. (b) Reference model.

More »

Fig 25 Expand

Fig 26.

Relative errors in displacement of the three models with respect to nDOFs.

More »

Fig 26 Expand

Table 5.

Results of the mesh sensitivity analysis.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 27.

Comparison between the load-displacement curves by the test and FE analysis.

(a) Specimen B50-T125-S125. (b) Specimen B40-T125-S125. (c) Specimen B50-T100-S125. (d) Specimen B50-T125-S75.

More »

Fig 27 Expand

Table 6.

Initial stiffness and peak strength of each specimen by the test and FE analysis.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Relative ratio of the peak strength of each specimen to that of the reference specimen.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig 28.

Von Mises stress distribution at peak load (Reference specimen B50-T125-S125, stress unit: MPa).

More »

Fig 28 Expand

Fig 29.

Von Mises stress and DAMAGEC distributions of the lower wall concrete at several different loading stages (Reference specimen B50-T125-S125).

(a) Von Mises stress distribution. (Stress unit: MPa). (b) DAMAGEC distribution.

More »

Fig 29 Expand

Fig 30.

Von Mises stress and plastic strain distributions of the lower wall rebars at several different loading stages (Reference specimen B50-T125-S125).

(a) Von Mises stress distribution. (Stress unit: MPa). (b) Plastic strain distribution.

More »

Fig 30 Expand

Fig 31.

S22 stress distribution near the top of the lower wall.

(Stress unit: MPa). (a) Specimen B50-T125-S125. (b) Specimen B40-T125-S125. (c) Specimen B50-T100-S125. (d) Specimen B50-T125-S75.

More »

Fig 31 Expand