Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

More »

Expand

Table 1.

Social and family characteristics of children, mothers and other primary caregivers (n = 231).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Mean CRQ-P/C scale and domain scores with 95% confidence intervals for the Aboriginal Families Study (AFS) children and the Childhood Resilience Study children (excluding the AFS subsample).

(Circle = Tobit regression adjusting for child age is significant at p-value <0·05).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Mean CRQ-P/C domain and scale scores for the Aboriginal Families Study children by child gender, with Tobit logistic regression modelling differences between mean resilience scores for Aboriginal Families Study children compared to other Childhood Resilience Study children (n = 1132).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Mean CRQ-P/C scale and domain scores with 95% confidence intervals by gender (n = 231).

(Circle = Tobit regression adjusting for child age is significant at p-value <0·05).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 3.

Mean CRQ-P/C domain and scale scores for the Aboriginal Families Study children by child gender, with Tobit logistic regression modelling differences between mean resilience scores for girls compared to boys (n = 231).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 3.

Proportion of girls and boys in the Aboriginal Families Study with positive wellbeing or high mental health competence in each resilience category (high/medium and low scores) (n = 231).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 4.

Univariable and multivariable linear regression models of child resilience and gender on the SDQ total difficulties score, adjusting for sociodemographic factors (n = 231).

More »

Table 4 Expand