Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Participant demographics and self-reported psychiatric diagnoses (N = 43).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Means, standard deviations, and correlations with confidence intervals of measures of BPD features and identity disturbances (N = 43).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Study procedure and displays and timings of a trial in the panel Social Feedback Task.

Participants were asked to rate their level of affiliation to the panel members after trial 9, 21, 33 and 45.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Participants’ mood when receiving feedback depends on the feedback valence (negative, intermediate, or positive) and how applicable the feedback is to the self (rating 1 to 8).

Line depicts predicted mood responses. Margins around the line indicate 95% CI. Distribution of applicability ratings is plotted along x-axis.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Negative self-views affect mood for negative, intermediate, and positive feedback.

Line depicts predicted mood responses. Margins around the line indicate 95% CI. Distribution of negative self-views is plotted along x-axis.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Level of affiliation with the positive, intermediate, and negative panel member in terms closeness, trust and liking, depends on negative self-views.

Lines depict predicted affiliation ratings. Margin around the line indicates 95% CI. Distribution of negative self-views is plotted along x-axis.

More »

Fig 4 Expand