Table 1.
FDM, AHP, and hybrid studies on the indicator system.
Fig 1.
Research framework.
Table 2.
Preliminary construction of student development model indicators.
Table 3.
Results of the first round of the expert survey.
Table 4.
Indicators of the refined student development model.
Fig 2.
Double triangular fuzzy numbers [46].
Table 5.
Statistical analysis table of basic data of survey experts.
Table 6.
Judgment basis and the degree of influence.
Table 7.
Results of the screening indicator.
Table 8.
Results of screening student development indicators.
Table 9.
Pairwise comparison matrices of A, B1, C1, C2, and C3.
Table 10.
Final indicator weight and ranking.