Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Experimental setup and map of sites (see Acknowledgments for map copyright notice).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Most abundant (i.e. > 1% of reads) bacterial (A) phyla, (B) families and (C) genera across the experimental treatments. Colours in B and C refer to phylum classification.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Differences in microbial α diversity between agroecological and conventional farming at low and high altitude.

(A) Inverse Simpson index (IS), (B) Abundance Coverage Estimator (ACE), (C) Shannon-Weiner index (H) and(D) Faith’s Phylogenetic Diversity (PD). Significant differences as detected by ANOVA are indicated.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Hypothesis testing framework and consensus approach (see methods) to verify differences in α and β microbial diversity (detailed results in S2 Table).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 4.

Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) of the microbial communities observed in agroecological and conventional farming at low and high altitude.

Results are based on either ASVs frequencies or centered log-ratio transformed, compositional data (CLR-CoDa). For the different groups, 95% confidence ellipses are indicated.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Abundance of Romboutsia in conventional and agroecological farming at high altitude.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Abundance of Lysinibacillus, Empedobacter, Propionispira and Erysipelothrix in conventional and agroecological farming at high altitude.

More »

Fig 6 Expand