Table 1.
Similarity score of remote versus in-person assessments for NSAA items.
Fig 1.
Bland-Altman analysis plot of remote and in-clinic assessments shows relative agreement between the two modalities for the NSAA.
Measurements closer to the center line of zero bias mean difference indicate higher levels of agreement. aX-axis is time in seconds. NSAA, North Star Ambulatory Assessment.
Fig 2.
Bland-Altman analysis plot of remote and in-clinic assessments shows relative agreement between the two modalities for the supine to stand assessment.
Measurements closer to the center line of zero bias mean difference indicate higher levels of agreement. aX-axis is time in seconds.
Fig 3.
Bland-Altman analysis plot of remote and in-clinic assessments shows relative agreement between the two modalities for the 10MWR assessment.
Measurements closer to the center line of zero bias mean difference indicate higher levels of agreement. aX-axis is time in seconds. 10MWR, 10-meter Walk/Run.
Fig 4.
Correlation analysis of remote and in-clinic assessments demonstrates strong correlation between both modalities for the NSAA.
CI, confidence interval; ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient; NSAA, North Star Ambulatory Assessment.
Fig 5.
Correlation analysis of remote and in-clinic assessments demonstrates strong correlation between both modalities for the supine to stand assessment.
CI, confidence interval; ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient.
Fig 6.
Correlation analysis of remote and in-clinic assessments demonstrates strong correlation between both modalities for the 10MWR assessment.
10MWR, 10-meter Walk/Run; CI, confidence interval; ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient.