Fig 1.
Diagram of SCA search mode.
Fig 2.
Traditional SCO system with open loop representation.
Fig 3.
Idea of SCO with BE.
Fig 4.
System with considering open loop representation for SCO with BE.
Fig 5.
Flowchart represents SCO+BE.
Fig 6.
Studied cart system.
Fig 7.
The DC motor’s armature circuit [1].
Fig 8.
Block diagram illustrating the design of the used DC motor.
Table 1.
Studded Values of system parameters.
Table 2.
Studded electrical motor parameters maximum values.
Fig 9.
Basic PV controller design.
Fig 10.
Block schematic of the controller-equipped system.
Table 3.
Parameters of SCO.
Fig 11.
The option of sum point movement.
Fig 12.
Load disturbance.
Fig 13.
The outcome of tunning PV controller using conventional SCO/SCO+BE in the event of a load disturbance.
Fig 14.
The outcome of tunning PV controller using conventional Jaya+BE /SCO+BE in the event of a load disturbance.
Table 4.
Time response parameters.
Fig 15.
The proposed system using digital MATLAB controller.
Fig 16.
Experimental setup.
Fig 17.
The outcome of tunning PV controller using conventional SCO in the event of a load disturbance.
Fig 18.
The outcome of tunning PV controller using conventional SCO/SCO+BE in the event of a load disturbance.
Table 5.
An optimization comparison between SCO and SCO + BE.
Table 6.
Statistical analysis for I, SCO and SCO+BE.
Fig 19.
Power flow chart of the studied microgrid.
Fig 20.
Block diagram of the model of microgrid power system.
Table 7.
Parameters of the studied micro-grid.
Fig 21.
Reduced model of the studied microgrid.
Fig 22.
Frequency deviation.
Fig 23.
Diesel power deviation.
Table 8.
Data of SCO.