Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Proposed methodology.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Sample images from the BreakHis dataset.

(a) Benign images, (b) Malignant images.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

CSCO’s flowchart.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Hybrid feature selection algorithm of CSCO-ROA.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Comparing the proposed CVAE design to a standard VAE framework.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Proposed CVAE model.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Accuracy vs. Epoch.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Loss vs. Epoch.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Segmentation results of the proposed model.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Table 1.

Features selected by optimization algorithms.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 10.

Confusion matrix for BrC classification on BreakHis dataset.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Performance of classification model with and without feature selection.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Table 2.

Performance of classification model using 5-fold cross-validation (before FS).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Performance of classification model using 5-fold cross-validation (after FS).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 12.

Performance of breast cancer classification technique.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Table 4.

Performance metrics for BrC.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Compares the accuracy, dataset, and FPR of our suggested model with existing methods.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 13.

Comparison of AUC values for BrC classification techniques.

More »

Fig 13 Expand