Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Proportion of women applicants to surgical specialties from 2003–2022.

*Data for vascular surgery not available prior to 2012. P values are from the Cochran-Armitage trend test for proportions. Bold font indicates statistical significance (p<0.05). The formula used for percentage of first choice women applicants was (women applicants / [men applicants + women applicants]) *100. ObGyn: Obstetrics and Gynecology.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Proportion of women matriculants to surgical specialties from 2003–2022.

*Data for vascular surgery not available prior to 2012. P values are from the Cochran-Armitage trend test for proportions. Bold font indicates statistical significance (p<0.05). The formula used for percentage of first choice women matriculants was (women matriculants / [men matriculants + women matriculants]) *100. ObGyn: Obstetrics & Gynecology.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Trends and gender differences in match rates for applicants to surgical specialties from 2003–2022.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 3.

Ratio between women and men match rate to surgical specialties from 2003–2022.

*Data for vascular surgery not available prior to 2012. †The formula used for ratio of women to men match rate was: (women match rate / men match rate) = ([women matriculants / women applicants] / [men matriculants / men applicants]). ObGyn: Obstetrics and Gynecology.

More »

Fig 3 Expand