Fig 1.
The change among the different treatment in WWTPs.
(A) Dynamic changes of the content of DMF and (B) COD; (C) Correlation analysis of DMF and COD; (D) The abundance of 16S rRNA; Influent wastewater, IN; Anaerobic process wastewater, AP; Anoxic process wastewater, ANP; Aerobic process wastewater, AEP; Effluent wastewater, EF.
Fig 2.
The abundance of ARGs in WWTPs.
(A) PCA analysis between different samples in WWTPs. (B) the relative abundance of ARGs in WWTPs; (C) the absolute abundance of ARGs in WWTPs; (D) Chord diagram analysis between the sample and ARG subtype; (E) the mechanisms of ARGs variation in WWTPs.
Fig 3.
The ARGs changed along the WWTPs process.
(A) venn diagrams analysis between the samples. (B) 53 share genes changed between samples; (C) 18 new generated ARGs changed between samples.
Fig 4.
Changes of bacterial community.
(A) PCA analysis between samples base on the OTUs; (B) the structure of bacterial between samples; (C) the variation of bacterial at phylum level between samples. (D) the variation of pathogen at species level between samples.
Fig 5.
The correlation between ARG and their host bacteria.
(A) the analysis base on Spearman’s correlation between ARGs and their host; network analysis revealing the correlations among the fates of ARGs, MGEs, DMF and bacterial in influent (B) and effluent (C).