Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Copula specifications.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Variables used in the regression analysis.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Trading hours in the US and China.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Dynamics of US-Chinese agricultural futures prices.

In the figure, the solid red line represents the dynamic trend of futures prices in the US, while the blue dashed line represents the dynamic of futures prices in China. The shaded areas correspond to various crisis periods.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 3.

Descriptive statistics for the returns.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Pearson correlations of returns in the US-China pair markets.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Estimations of the marginal distribution models.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

The selected optimal copula based on log-likelihood values.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Estimated parameters of copula model.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig 3.

Smoothed probabilities for the regimes of dependence between and .

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Smoothed probabilities for the regimes of dependence between and .

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Dynamics of dependence between and .

The horizontal lines in the figure are static dependence parameters. For the MSTV SJC copula model, the red line indicates the upward tail dependence, and the purple line indicates the downward tail dependence. In the figure, the periods for the GFC, the US-China trade war, the COVID-19 pandemic, and the Russia-Ukraine war are shaded.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Dynamics of dependence between and .

The horizontal lines in the figure are static dependence parameters. For the MSTV SJC copula model, the red line indicates the upward tail dependence, and the purple line indicates the downward tail dependence. In the figure, the periods for the GFC, the US-China trade war, the COVID-19 pandemic, and the Russia-Ukraine war are shaded.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 8.

Summarization of the VaR, CoVaR, and ΔCoVaR for agricultural futures.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Fig 7.

Up ΔCoVaR from the US to Chinese agricultural futures markets.

All values of ΔCoVaR have been multiplied by a factor of 100.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Up ΔCoVaR from the Chinese to US agricultural futures markets.

All values of ΔCoVaR have been multiplied by a factor of 100.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Down ΔCoVaR from the US to Chinese agricultural futures markets.

All values of ΔCoVaR have been multiplied by a factor of 100.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Down ΔCoVaR from the Chinese to US agricultural futures markets.

All values of ΔCoVaR have been multiplied by a factor of 100. In the figure, we remove the dynamics of the risk spillovers for corn futures because their risk spillovers are not statistically significant.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Table 9.

K-S test for the asymmetry of upside and downside risk spillovers.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Table 10.

K-S test for the asymmetry of risk spillovers from the US to China and from China to the US.

More »

Table 10 Expand

Table 11.

Descriptive statistics of the sample from January 2006 to May 2020.

More »

Table 11 Expand

Table 12.

Pearson correlations of regression variables.

More »

Table 12 Expand

Table 13.

The regression results for all samples.

More »

Table 13 Expand

Table 14.

The regression results during the GFC.

More »

Table 14 Expand

Table 15.

The regression results during the US-China trade war (only including the period before the COVID-19 pandemic).

More »

Table 15 Expand

Table 16.

The regression results during the period of the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine war in 2022.

More »

Table 16 Expand