Table 1.
Sociodemographic and other characteristics of the sample (N = 387).
Table 2.
Bivariate analysis of factors associated with resilience.
Table 3.
Correlations of continuous variables with resilience.
Fig 1.
(a) Relation between extraversion and post-traumatic growth (R2 = .191); (b) Relation between post-traumatic growth and resilience (R2 = .332); (c) Total effect of extraversion on resilience (R2 = .222); (c’) Direct effect of extraversion on resilience. Numbers are displayed as regression coefficient (standard error). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Fig 2.
(a) Relation between agreebleness and post-traumatic growth (R2 = .191); (b) Relation between post-traumatic growth and resilience (R2 = .332); (c) Total effect of agreebleness on resilience (R2 = .222); (c’) Direct effect of agreebleness on resilience. Numbers are displayed as regression coefficient (standard error). *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001.
Fig 3.
(a) Relation between conscientiousness and post-traumatic growth (R2 = .191); (b) Relation between post-traumatic growth and resilience (R2 = .332); (c) Total effect of conscientiousness on resilience (R2 = .222); (c’) Direct effect of conscientiousness on resilience. Numbers are displayed as regression coefficient (standard error). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Table 4.
Mediation analyses results, taking each personality trait as an independent variable, post-traumatic growth as the mediator and resilience as the dependent variable.