Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Recent literature on chest disease identification using the DL model.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

CSI, CXR, and CT scans are the three diagnostic tools that are indicated for use in the process of identifying a variety of chest disorders.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Sample CXR and CT scan images of multiple chest diseases.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Summary of the datasets of CXR and CT scans of several chest diseases.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Statistics of the cough sound datasets.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 3.

Scalogram image of multiple chest diseases coughs sound.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 4.

Summary of the datasets of CXR, CT scans, and CSI of several chest diseases after applying SMOTE Tomek.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 4.

Steps of conducting pre-processing.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 5.

CXR, CT scan, and CSI size and storage at each preprocessing step.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 5.

Summary of the proposed models.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 6.

Architecture of proposed base model P (1).

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Description of four proposed models.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Hyperparameters value utilized for fine-tuning the proposed models.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Fig 6.

Generating CXR, CT scan, and CSI using MWDG.

(a) Rotation, (b) HST, (c) VST, (d) NI, (e) GCOR, (f) RTS, and (g) Scaling.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Training-Validation accuracy and loss.

(a) Vgg-19, (b) ResNet-101, (c) ResNet-50, (d) DenseNet-121, (e) Inception-V3, (f) EfficientNetB0, (g) DenseNet-201, and (h) Proposed P(4) model.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 9.

Results comparison of proposed model P (1) to P (4) over validation set of 5 runs.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Table 10.

Results comparison of the proposed model with other baseline models.

More »

Table 10 Expand

Fig 8.

Confusion matrix.

(a) Vgg-19, (b) ResNet-101, (c) ResNet-50, (d) DenseNet-121, (e) Inception-V3, (f) Proposed P(4) model, (g) EfficientNetB0, and (h) DenseNet-201.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

AU(ROC) for class wise evaluation of chest diseases.

(a) Vgg-19, (b) ResNet-101, (c) ResNet-50, (d) DenseNet-121, (e) Inception-V3, (f) Proposed P(4) model, (g) EfficientNetB0, and (h) DenseNet-201.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

GRAD-CAM visualization of the proposed model for highlighting the infected region of nine chest diseases.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Table 11.

Results were obtained by integrating different modules into proposed models.

More »

Table 11 Expand

Table 12.

Comparison of the proposed model with modern SOTA models.

More »

Table 12 Expand