Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Example of each measurement variable plotted against step-averaged velocity.

Data are from one subject in 6 kg loading condition. Gray circles: Measured values. Black triangles: Values at every 0.5 m/s obtained using spline interpolation technique. A few subjects showed the rapid change in some variable near the maximal step-averaged velocity in resisted sprint (arrows) into “bouncing” manner. Therefore, steps at less than 98% maximal step-averaged velocity in each trial (vertical dashed line) were used for analysis. Fap: Anteroposterior ground reaction force. Fver: Vertical ground reaction force. RF: Ratio of stance-averaged Fap to resultant ground reaction force.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Spatiotemporal variables as a function of step-averaged velocity.

Values are means ± standard deviations. Symbols in the figure indicate significant differences between loading conditions (p < .05); e.g., “0–10” denotes a significant difference between 0 kg (unresisted sprinting) and 10 kg loading condition. Horizontal lines in panel c indicate velocity range in each loading condition in which values for all subjects were obtained.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Combinations of loading conditions with significant differences in spatiotemporal variables.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 3.

Ground reaction force variables as a function of running velocity.

Values are means ± standard deviations. Symbols in the figure indicate significant differences between loading conditions (p < .05); e.g., “0–10” denotes a significant difference between 0 kg (unresisted sprint) and 10 kg loading condition. Horizontal lines in panel c indicate velocity range in each loading condition in which values for all subjects were obtained. Fap: Anteroposterior ground reaction force. Fver: Vertical ground reaction force. RF: Ratio of Fap to resultant ground reaction force.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Combinations of loading conditions with significant differences in ground reaction force variables.

More »

Table 2 Expand