Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Study participants (N = 54 students).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Self-reported data at the end of the research experience.

RECCS student responses are compared with responses from undergraduate researchers in a large sample [26].

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Self-report data for each item in the URSSA question blocks for RECCS students from 2015–2019 (N = 54).

Responses on a scale of 1 to 5; data reported as group mean.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Mentor perceptions of student preparation, work ethic, and quality of deliverables in terms of their expectations for undergraduate researchers (N = 48 students rated by 63 mentors).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Mentor ratings of students’ progress as scientists-in-training (n = 20 students rated by 29 mentors*).

*Data collected from 2018 and 2019 cohorts only.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

Percent of mentor responses that included content in each code category for the question, In what areas did your student make the most progress? (N = 28 mentors).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Impact of the research experience on academic and professional preparedness and interest (N = 54).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 4.

Percent of student responses that included content in each code category for the question, How did your research experience influence your thinking about future career and graduate school plans? Please explain. (n = 54).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Current academic status of RECCS alumni (n = 53).

More »

Table 5 Expand