Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

The block diagram of proposed method, showing the key processing stages used in this study.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

ECG signal examples in 60-second segments: (a) normal; (b) apnea class A.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

The employed wavelet decomposition scheme.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

The selected sub-bands coefficients respectively for ECG normal (left-column) and ECG apnea (right-column).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

The first five IMFs of d2s from Fig 3.

For the ECG normal (left-column) and for ECG apnea (right-column).

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 1.

Performance of the apnea classification scheme using various evaluation measures for the class A verses class B problem.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Performance of the apnea classification scheme using various evaluation measures for the class A versus class C problem.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Performance of the apnea classification scheme using various evaluation measures for the class B versus class C problem.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Performance of the apnea classification scheme using various evaluation measures for the class apnea verses class normal problem.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Comparison with state of the art counter parts.

More »

Table 5 Expand