Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Connected grid and unconnected grid.

The red point A and red line segment BC in (b) and (c) of the figure are connected points and lines.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Connected closed sector and open sector.

Where the red points M and N are the incident vertices.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Several common non-manifold forms.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Spatial relationship of the grid of intersecting fault surfaces.

The red boxed part is the map after the fault slip, and the right figure shows its enlarged part.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Grid spatial relationship between faults and stratigraphy.

The right figure shows the enlarged view in the red box.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Spatial relationship between geotechnical interface and geological interface of fault zone.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Spatial relationship between geotechnical interface and geological interface of fault zone.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Constraint processing of intersecting faults and stratigraphic grid.

The bottom right corner shows the enlarged part of the red box. The black line indicates the intersection line of the two faces, and the white dots indicate the required corresponding topology line of the face, we can judge whether the current topology of the two faces is consistent or not based on the white dots.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Confined processing of the geological interface between the range grid and the fault zone.

The bottom right corner shows the enlarged part of the red box. The black line indicates the intersection line of the two faces, and the white dots indicate the required corresponding topology line of the face, we can judge whether the current topology of the two faces is consistent or not based on the white dots.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Several tetrahedral elements with poor shape quality.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Triangle optimization pseudo-code.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Comparison chart before and after grid optimization (partial).

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Topology adjustment before and after topology adjustment.

The dashed box shows the comparison before and after topology modification.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

TetGen library for optimizing tetrahedral pseudo-code.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

Tetrahedral optimization of the TetGen library to solve local optimum pseudo-code.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

Tetrahedral solid model generated by closed-connected mesh.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Fig 17.

Workflow for conversion to finite element mesh using Ansys.

More »

Fig 17 Expand

Table 1.

Lithological information table.

More »

Table 1 Expand