Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Indicator system for county-level digital economies in China.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Indicator weights; test values of the industrial environment system.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Interaction of the research method.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Spatial distribution pattern of China’s rural digital economy.

(a) Overall level, (b) industrial environment, (c) digital index, (d) development vitality, (e) Internet effect, (f) e-commerce level.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 3.

Global spatial autocorrelation results for digital economy development levels at different scales.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 3.

LISA map of the digital economy at different levels.

(a) County level, (b) city level (average of the county level), (c) province level (average of the county level).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 4.

The q-values of digital economy development levels at provincial and city scales.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Coefficient of variation of digital economy level in each province.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 4.

Factors affecting China’s rural digital economy.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Spatial distribution of rural digital economy types in China.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 6.

Explanation of county-level digital economy types in China.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 6.

Comparative analysis of the spatial pattern of the digital economy at the city level.

(a) Average of county-level digital economy, (b) H3C’s city-level digital economy index.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Comparative analysis of the spatial pattern of the digital economy at the province level.

(a) Average of county-level digital economy, (b) Wang’s province-level digital economy index.

More »

Fig 7 Expand