Table 1.
Table 2.
Various preference scales devised for pairwise comparisons of alternatives.
Chart 1.
Simulation algorithm applied for the research.
Steps relate to descriptions in Chart 1.
Fig 1.
Flowchart of simulation algorithm applied for the research.
Table 3.
Mean values and p–Quantiles of AAE for selected scales.
Table 4.
Mean values and p–Quantiles of MAD for selected scales.
Fig 2.
The PCM of criteria with regard to the goal, and its related PV.
Fig 3.
The PCM of alternatives with regard to the first criterion, and its related PV.
Fig 4.
The PCM of alternatives with regard to the second criterion, and its related PV.
Fig 5.
The PCM of alternatives with regard to the third criterion, and its related PV.
Fig 6.
The extended PCM of alternatives with regard to the first criterion, and its related PV.
Fig 7.
The extended PCM of alternatives with regard to the second criterion, and its related PV.
Fig 8.
The extended PCM of alternatives with regard to the third criterion, and its related PV.
Table 5.
Mean values and p–Quantiles of AAE for Saaty’s linear scale.
Table 6.
Mean values and p–Quantiles of MAD for Saaty’s linear scale.
Table 7.
Mean values and p–Quantiles of AAE for ILS.
Table 8.
Mean values and p–Quantiles of MAD for ILS.
Table 9.
Mean values and p–Quantiles of AAE for GS.
Table 10.
Mean values and p–Quantiles of MAD for GS.