Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Schematic illustration of our proposed FDNet through the comparsion with others popular algorithms.

From left to right: the infrared image, the visible image, the fusion results of the CNN [18], the Deeplearning approach [19], the ResNet50 approsch [20], and our proposed FDNet.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Block diagram of attention mechanism.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Depthwise separable convolution process.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

General framework diagram.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

The structure diagram of multi-scale feature extraction map.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 1.

Depthwise separable process parameter settings.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 6.

I-CBAM overall structure diagram.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Decomposition network framework.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Schematic diagram of adaptive weight block.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Module ablation experimental results.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Table 2.

Objective evaluation results of ablation experiments.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 10.

Decomposition network ablation experiment.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Table 3.

Objective evaluation results of ablation experiments.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 11.

Intensity loss ablation experiment.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Gradient loss ablation experiment.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Table 4.

Objective evaluation results of ablation experiments.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 13.

Nato camp fusion results.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Helicopter fusion results.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

Marne-04 fusion results.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

Movie-01 fusion results.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Fig 17.

Movie-18 fusion results.

More »

Fig 17 Expand

Fig 18.

Bench fusion results.

More »

Fig 18 Expand

Table 5.

The quality evaluation results of the EN.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

The quality evaluation results of the AG.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

The quality evaluation results of the SD.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

The quality evaluation results of the SF.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

The quality evaluation results of the MI.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Table 10.

The quality evaluation results of the VIFF.

More »

Table 10 Expand

Table 11.

The quality evaluation results of the SNR.

More »

Table 11 Expand

Table 12.

The quality evaluation results of the CC.

More »

Table 12 Expand