Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Non-Māori-speaking New Zealanders’ mean wordhood confidence ratings for real word and non-word stimuli per frequency bin, and their relation to phonotactic score.

(Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Raw data from Experiment 1 (Word Identification task) showing mean wordhood confidence ratings for real word (blue triangles) and non word (black circles) stimuli.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Model summary for Experiment 1.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Model summary for investigation of individual differences in Experiment 1, using participant d-prime.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Partial effect plots for predicted ratings.

It shows interactions of participant d-prime with effects of: (a) the interaction of phonotactic score and stimulus type (word or non-word); (b) the presence of a macron; (c) the number of phonological neighbours. Participant d-prime was entered in the statistical model as a continuous variable, but is taken at two fixed values here for illustrative purposes: high (d-prime = 3) and low (d-prime = 1).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Proportion of correct definitions as a function of familiarity, based on the predicted mean ratings from Experiment 1.

Selected words are labeled adjacent to the corresponding point.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 3.

Model results for Experiment 2 (modelling definition accuracy).

More »

Table 3 Expand