Table 1.
Some representative literatures on the prediction model.
Fig 1.
Calculation process of ICEEMDAN.
Fig 2.
Informer model.
Fig 3.
Calculation process of encoder.
Fig 4.
Structure diagram of LSTM.
Fig 5.
Decomposition of test wind speed set.
Table 2.
RMSE of each subsequence predicted by two predictors.
Fig 6.
Comparison of test results.
Table 3.
Comparison of prediction accuracy of three models.
Fig 7.
Framework of the proposed hybrid model.
Table 4.
The statistics of wind speed data sets in two cases.
Fig 8.
Wind speed series (Case 1).
Fig 9.
Wind speed series (Case2).
Table 5.
P-value of ADF test for each sequence.
Table 6.
Main parameter settings for each model.
Fig 10.
Decomposition results of wind speed series by ICEEMDAN (Case 1).
Fig 11.
Decomposition results of wind speed series by ICEEMDAN (Case2).
Fig 12.
The MFE value of IMFs (Case1).
Fig 13.
The MFE value of IMFs (Case2).
Fig 14.
The MFE value of IMFs (Index chart of Case2).
Fig 15.
New sequence diagram of IMFs recombination (Case 1).
Fig 16.
New sequence diagram of IMFs recombination (Case2).
Table 7.
MFE values of IMFs.
Table 8.
The recombined sequence.
Table 9.
The effect of two kinds of predictors on different subsequences.
Fig 17.
The final prediction results of wind speed (Case1).
Fig 18.
The final prediction results of wind speed (Case2).
Table 10.
Comparison of a single predictive model.
Table 11.
Comparison of decomposition mechanisms.
Table 12.
Comparison of mixed prediction models.