Table 1.
Participants characteristics.
Fig 1.
Overview of change in walk-DMC scores between the two assessments.
In both figures, participant numbers have been ordered from greatest improvement to greatest deterioration in walk-DMC scores, with the order of participant numbers differing between the two figures. Walk-DMC- the walking dynamic motor control index.
Table 2.
Muscle synergies parameters and GPS value in both assessments.
Fig 2.
Movement analysis profile for the more involved leg (n = 18).
The numbers within the bars represent the mean and the lines are the 95% confidence intervals. Dark colours—first assessment, light colours—second assessment. Ant- anterior, Post- posterior, Flex- flexion, Ext- extension, DF- dorsiflexion, PF- plantarflexion, Add- adduction, Abd- abduction, IR- internet rotation, ER- external rotation.
Fig 3.
The relationship between the changes in the walk-DMC to the hip flexion/extension GVS (a), the relationship between the changes in the walk-DMC to the hip internal/external rotation GVS (b).
All relationships were in the more involved leg. Walk-DMC- the walking dynamic motor control index, GVS- gait variable score.
Fig 4.
Overview of change in hip flexion/extension and hip internal/external rotation GVS values, between the two assessments.
In both figures, participant numbers have been ordered from greatest improvement to greatest deterioration in the GVS value, with the order of participant numbers differing between the two figures. GVS- gait variable score.