Table 1.
Makes and models of devices included in study.
Table 2.
Flow chart of assessment.
Table 3.
Characteristics of the study population by first device used (N = 118).
Table 4.
Cardiovascular, musculoskeletal and respiratory health status of the study population by first device used (N = 118).
Fig 1.
Plot of the difference in mean SBP (mmHg) between the Omron 705-CP and Omron HEM-907 by the average SBP with 95% limits of agreement.
Fig 2.
Plot of the difference in mean DBP (mmHg) between the Omron 705-CP and Omron HEM-907 by the average DBP with 95% limits of agreement.
Table 5.
Differences in mean and limits of agreement for each pair of devices used to measure blood pressure, grip strength and lung function.
Fig 3.
Bland Altman plots of grip strength (Jamar Plus+–Nottingham).
Plot of the difference in maximum grip strength (kg) between devices by average maximum grip strength on both devices with 95% limits of agreement.
Fig 4.
Bland Altman plots of grip strength (Jamar Hydraulic–Smedley).
Plot of the difference in maximum grip strength (kg) between devices by average maximum grip strength on both devices with 95% limits of agreement.
Fig 5.
Bland Altman plots of grip strength (Jamar Plus+–Jamar Hydraulic).
Plot of the difference in maximum grip strength (kg) between devices by average maximum grip strength on both devices with 95% limits of agreement.
Fig 6.
Bland Altman plots of grip strength (Jamar Plus+–Smedley).
Plot of the difference in maximum grip strength (kg) between devices by average maximum grip strength on both devices with 95% limits of agreement.
Fig 7.
Bland Altman plots of grip strength (Nottingham–Jamar Hydraulic).
Plot of the difference in maximum grip strength (kg) between devices by average maximum grip strength on both devices with 95% limits of agreement.
Fig 8.
Bland Altman plots of grip strength (Nottingham–Smedley).
Plot of the difference in maximum grip strength (kg) between devices by average maximum grip strength on both devices with 95% limits of agreement.
Fig 9.
Plot of the difference in mean maximum FEV1 between the Micro Medical and ndd Easy on-PC ultrasonic flow-sensor by average maximum FEV1 on both devices with 95% limits of agreement.
Fig 10.
Plot of the difference in mean maximum FVC between the Micro Medical and ndd Easy on-PC ultrasonic flow-sensor by average maximum FVC on both devices with 95% limits of agreement.